Pilot Benchmark

Societal Readiness Index

A six-pillar benchmark measuring how prepared societies are for AI — scored from policy and infrastructure data, and from structured civic dialogue captured at AI TownSquare sessions.

Dubai / UAE 67 Doha Coming 2026 Singapore Coming 2027

Dubai/UAE is the first fully scored cohort. Every city is benchmarked against the Global Average shown below.

67
out of 100

Dubai / UAE

44
out of 100

Global Average

Pilot baseline — not yet a global ranking. How these scores are built ↓

Several excellent AI-readiness indices already exist — and none of them ask the public directly. The SRI adds that missing layer: it scores governance, ethics, infrastructure, and the economy alongside structured civic dialogue, so a society's readiness reflects what its citizens actually experience, not policy documents alone.

Read the Manifesto behind the index →
Global Landscape

How the SRI compares.

Six frameworks measuring different slices of AI and digital readiness — scope, pillars, and what sets each apart.

Index & Sponsor Scope Pillars What Sets It Apart
Societal Readiness Index (SRI) AI TownSquare / SafeHaven Holistic societal capacity to adapt to AI, combining policy and infrastructure data with structured civic dialogue. Governance Agility · Citizen Empowerment · Ethical Infrastructure · Economic Adaptability · Technological Infrastructure · Inclusive Foresight The only index here built in part on live, structured public deliberation rather than desk research or expert survey alone. Currently a pilot cohort (Dubai/UAE) — not yet a global ranking.
Government AI Readiness Index Oxford Insights / IDRC Government and public-sector readiness to deploy AI. Government · Technology Sector · Data & Infrastructure Established, policy-focused methodology with wide country coverage.
Global AI Vibrancy / AI Index Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI Overall AI ecosystem vibrancy — innovation and societal impact. R&D · Economy · Education · Infrastructure · Diversity · Policy & Governance · Public Opinion · Responsible AI Data-rich, multi-indicator benchmark spanning both outputs and inputs, including public sentiment.
Global Competitiveness Index (4IR lens) World Economic Forum Broad economic competitiveness and innovation capacity for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Institutions · Infrastructure · ICT Adoption · Skills · Innovation Capability Macro-economic foundation readiness — not AI-specific, but strongly contextual.
AI Policy Observatory OECD Trustworthy AI development and use, aligned to the OECD AI Principles. The five OECD AI Principles, plus enablers — compute, data, R&D Principle-based and government-endorsed; focused on governance quality over raw capacity.
Digital Readiness / ICT Indices ITU, UNESCO, and others Core digital infrastructure, access, and skills — a pre-condition for AI readiness. ICT Access · ICT Use · ICT Skills Foundational digital-divide benchmarks, often tied to the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

Summarized from published methodology descriptions. Each organization's own site is the authoritative source for current scope and coverage.

Six Pillars of Readiness

Governance Governance Agility
Weight: 25%
Dubai/UAE
72
Global Avg
45

Regulatory frameworks, policy readiness, and institutional capacity for AI oversight.

Indicators & reference practice
Regulatory Frameworks
78
Policy Readiness
68
Institutional Capacity
70

What's measured: Days to enact AI-specific legislation; adoption of regulatory sandboxes.

Reference practice — Singapore: Singapore's AI Governance Testing Framework, revised on a quarterly cycle. (a global example of strong practice in this dimension, not a Dubai/UAE data source.)

Citizen Empowerment
Weight: 20%
Dubai/UAE
58
Global Avg
38

Public awareness, digital literacy, and citizen participation in AI governance.

Indicators & reference practice
Public Awareness
52
Digital Literacy
64
Civic Participation
55

What's measured: Share of citizens with baseline AI literacy; turnout in deliberative assemblies.

Reference practice — Taiwan: Taiwan's vTaiwan platform, where citizens co-design digital legislation. (a global example of strong practice in this dimension, not a Dubai/UAE data source.)

Ethics Ethical Infrastructure
Weight: 20%
Dubai/UAE
65
Global Avg
42

Ethical guidelines, bias mitigation, transparency, and accountability measures.

Indicators & reference practice
Ethical Guidelines
70
Bias Mitigation
58
Transparency
66

What's measured: Diversity of independent oversight bodies; existence of public AI-audit trails.

Reference practice — New York City: NYC's Local Law 144, requiring bias audits of automated hiring tools. (a global example of strong practice in this dimension, not a Dubai/UAE data source.)

Economic Adaptability
Weight: 15%
Dubai/UAE
70
Global Avg
50

Workforce transition readiness, reskilling infrastructure, and economic resilience.

Indicators & reference practice
Workforce Transition
65
Reskilling Programs
72
Economic Resilience
74

What's measured: Reskilling-program funding as a share of budget; pilot income-support programs.

Reference practice — Finland: Finland's AI-driven job-matching and reskilling initiatives. (a global example of strong practice in this dimension, not a Dubai/UAE data source.)

Infrastructure Technological Infrastructure
Weight: 10%
Dubai/UAE
82
Global Avg
55

Digital infrastructure, data governance, and technical capacity.

Indicators & reference practice
Digital Infrastructure
88
Data Governance
76
Technical Capacity
82

What's measured: Open-source AI adoption rate; cybersecurity-readiness posture.

Reference practice — India: India's Aadhaar digital-ID system, powering AI-driven welfare delivery at population scale. (a global example of strong practice in this dimension, not a Dubai/UAE data source.)

Foresight Inclusive Foresight
Weight: 10%
Dubai/UAE
60
Global Avg
35

Future-readiness planning, scenario analysis, and adaptive policy mechanisms.

Indicators & reference practice
Future Planning
62
Scenario Analysis
55
Adaptive Policy
63

What's measured: Global-South contribution to AI standards; youth participation in policy workshops.

Reference practice — Rwanda: Rwanda's collaborative AI-policy development with rural communities. (a global example of strong practice in this dimension, not a Dubai/UAE data source.)

Pillar Weights

100%
Governance Agility (25%)
Citizen Empowerment (20%)
Ethical Infrastructure (20%)
Economic Adaptability (15%)
Technological Infrastructure (10%)
Inclusive Foresight (10%)

Methodology

The Societal Readiness Index aggregates qualitative civic data from AI TownSquare sessions with quantitative policy and infrastructure metrics. Each session contributes to the index through structured dialogue outputs—the Civic Briefs.

Scores are weighted across six pillars that reflect the multidimensional nature of societal readiness for AI. Governance carries the highest weight (25%) because regulatory and institutional frameworks set the conditions for all other dimensions.

How a score is built

Raw indicators are normalized to a 0–100 scale against a best-case and worst-case benchmark:

Score = ((Worst − Actual) / (Worst − Best)) × 100

Illustrative example from the SRI white paper: a market taking 120 days to pass AI-specific legislation, against a 60-day best case and a 365-day worst case, normalizes to roughly 80 — showing how an operational metric becomes a comparable score. This is a worked example of the method, not a published national data point.

Where the data comes from

  • Public policy and legislative records
  • Institutional and infrastructure metrics — connectivity, cybersecurity posture, digital-ID coverage
  • Structured civic dialogue captured in Civic Briefs from AI TownSquare sessions

Pilot baseline, not a finished ranking. Dubai/UAE is currently the only fully scored cohort, benchmarked against an illustrative global average. Regional scores are updated as new sessions are conducted and new cities are added. The index is designed to be a living benchmark that evolves with new civic data, not a static league table.

Illustrative Example

How the index is meant to work

The SRI white paper walks through a hypothetical worked example to show the index's intended feedback loop — not a published result:

  1. Diagnose. A society scores 47/100 overall, with Ethical Infrastructure (20/100) and Inclusive Foresight (30/100) flagged as the weakest pillars.
  2. Intervene. Targeted civic dialogue sessions surface the gaps directly; policymakers partner on open-source audit tooling and expand reskilling stipends.
  3. Re-measure. The index is recalculated after the interventions. Gains in literacy and new policy commitments move the weakest pillars — and the overall score rises toward 68/100.

This is a worked example from the white paper Towards Societal Readiness, used here to illustrate the diagnose → intervene → re-measure cycle the SRI is designed to run.

Want to contribute to the index?

Apply for a seat at an upcoming AI TownSquare session. Your voice shapes the data.

Join the Waitlist →